Mazda CX-3 G 150 AWD
Model Year 2015, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.0 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Mazda CX-3 G 150 AWD

The Japanese car first seen in 2015 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 200km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 8.7s and consumping around 6.4 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
displacement:
1998
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
150
hp
torque:
207
Nm
Vehicle information - Mazda CX-3
85% score
produced:
2015. -
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4275
mm
width:
1765
mm
height:
1535
mm
boot:
350 - 1260
l
fuel tank:
48
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

D

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

6.4

l/100km

weight:
1310
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
8.7
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
8.1
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.4
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
150
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

D

category

automatic

6 gears

average

6.3

l/100km

weight:
1340
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.6
s
top speed:
195
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.8
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
146
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Mazda CX-3

EuroNCAP: 85% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2014. to -
EuroNCAP: 96% score

acceleration

48%

faster

consumption

7%

higher

power

29%

higher

length

3%

longer

weight

5%

higher

fuel tank

4%

larger

boot

17%

larger

boot ext.

2%

smaller

price

50%

higher

produced from 2013. to -
EuroNCAP: 92% score

acceleration

28%

slower

consumption

12%

lower

power

25%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

14%

lower

fuel tank

4%

larger

boot

19%

larger

boot ext.

44%

smaller

price

47%

lower

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

15%

slower

consumption

14%

lower

power

15%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

6%

lower

fuel tank

4%

larger

boot

23%

larger

boot ext.

23%

smaller

price

22%

higher

produced from 2016. to -
EuroNCAP: 96% score

acceleration

30%

slower

consumption

7%

higher

power

30%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

9%

larger

boot

2%

larger

boot ext.

8%

larger

price

11%

higher

produced from 2016. to -
EuroNCAP: 95% score

acceleration

16%

slower

consumption

=

equal

power

29%

lower

length

2%

longer

weight

8%

higher

fuel tank

4%

larger

boot

5%

larger

boot ext.

241%

smaller

price

24%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...