Ford Mondeo Wagon 2.0 EcoBoost
Model Year 2010, D - Segment (Large family car)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
wagon
wagon
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Mondeo Wagon 2.0 EcoBoost

The American car first seen in 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a large family car with the top speed of 245km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 7.5s and consumping around 7.6 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mazda / Ford

2.0 LF-VD Turbo

displacement:
1999
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
240
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mondeo
~90% score
produced:
2010. - 2015.
 
body style:
wagon
5 door
length:
4830
mm
width:
1886
mm
height:
1512
mm
boot:
554 - 1745
l
fuel tank:
70
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

7.6

l/100km

weight:
1488
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.5
s
top speed:
245
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
176
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

7.7

l/100km

weight:
1488
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.8
s
top speed:
241
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.9
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.7
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
179
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
fuel supply

Safety results for Ford Mondeo

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2010. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 81% score

acceleration

25%

slower

consumption

12%

lower

power

54%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

1%

larger

boot

10%

smaller

boot ext.

19%

smaller

price

29%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: 77% score

acceleration

28%

slower

consumption

9%

lower

power

60%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

9%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

7%

smaller

boot ext.

0%

larger

price

46%

higher

produced from 2012. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 92% score

acceleration

18%

slower

consumption

29%

lower

power

45%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

15%

lower

fuel tank

13%

smaller

boot

6%

smaller

boot ext.

5%

smaller

price

56%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

17%

slower

consumption

10%

higher

power

41%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

7%

lower

fuel tank

6%

smaller

boot

9%

smaller

boot ext.

10%

smaller

price

26%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: 94% score

acceleration

=

equal

consumption

6%

higher

power

=

equal

length

4%

shorter

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

29%

smaller

boot ext.

41%

smaller

price

33%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...