Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo AWD
Model Year 2008, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.5 L5 20v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo AWD

The American car was first shown in year 2008 and powered by a 5 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Volvo. The engine offers a displacement of 2.5 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 5 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 210km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 8.2s and consuming around 9.9 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Volvo

2.5 B5254T3

displacement:
2521
cc
configuration:
5 - Inline
 
valves:
20, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
200
hp
torque:
320
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Kuga
~90% score
produced:
2008. - 2013.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4443
mm
width:
1842
mm
height:
1677
mm
boot:
410 - 1405
l
fuel tank:
58
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

F

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

9.9

l/100km

weight:
1513
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
8.2
s
top speed:
210
km/h
cons. (urban):
13.9
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.6
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.9
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
234
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

F

category

automatic

5 gears

average

10.3

l/100km

weight:
1513
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
8.8
s
top speed:
205
km/h
cons. (urban):
14.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.8
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
244
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
mechanics
electrics

Safety results for Ford Kuga

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2009. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

29%

faster

consumption

10%

lower

power

22%

higher

length

=

equal

weight

5%

higher

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

2%

larger

boot ext.

4%

smaller

price

120%

lower

produced from 2007. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

15%

slower

consumption

13%

lower

power

18%

lower

length

4%

longer

weight

5%

higher

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

123%

smaller

boot ext.

17%

larger

price

175%

lower

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

23%

slower

consumption

30%

lower

power

20%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

6%

lower

fuel tank

5%

smaller

boot

31%

larger

boot ext.

2%

larger

price

91%

lower

produced from 2007. to 2011.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

31%

slower

consumption

3%

lower

power

47%

lower

length

3%

longer

weight

11%

higher

fuel tank

11%

larger

boot

11%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

225%

lower

produced from 2006. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

23%

slower

consumption

15%

lower

power

32%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

9%

larger

boot ext.

20%

larger

price

211%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.565different vehicle models
2.275engines
14.080specific cars