Mitsubishi ASX 1.6 MIVEC (117hp)
Model Year 2012 (Mitsubishi RVR), J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

4.3

rating

Badges:
suv
suv
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
1.6 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Mitsubishi ASX 1.6 MIVEC (117hp)

The Japanese car was first shown in year 2012 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Mitsubishi. The engine offers a displacement of 1.6 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 183km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 11.4s and consuming around 6.0 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mitsubishi

1.6 4A92

displacement:
1590
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
117
hp
torque:
154
Nm
Vehicle information - Mitsubishi ASX
86% score
produced:
2012. - 2016.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4295
mm
width:
1770
mm
height:
1615
mm
boot:
416 - 1193
l
fuel tank:
63
l

Check vehicle history

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

C

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

6.0

l/100km

weight:
1275
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
11.4
s
top speed:
183
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.9
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.0
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
137
g/km

Latest vehicles added by our users

There are currently no such vehicles in our community

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
mechanics

Safety results for Mitsubishi ASX

EuroNCAP: 86% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2012. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

1%

faster

consumption

2%

lower

power

=

equal

length

1%

longer

weight

=

equal

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

6%

larger

boot ext.

170%

smaller

price

16%

lower

produced from 2011. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 94% score

acceleration

24%

faster

consumption

2%

lower

power

22%

higher

length

2%

longer

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

2%

larger

boot

10%

larger

boot ext.

13%

larger

price

26%

higher

produced from 2012. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 96% score

acceleration

9%

slower

consumption

8%

higher

power

2%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

19%

smaller

boot

15%

smaller

boot ext.

13%

larger

price

2%

higher

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

13%

slower

consumption

8%

higher

power

3%

lower

length

3%

longer

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

5%

smaller

boot

9%

smaller

boot ext.

6%

larger

price

6%

higher

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 88% score

acceleration

20%

faster

consumption

2%

lower

power

3%

higher

length

3%

shorter

weight

21%

lower

fuel tank

26%

smaller

boot

19%

smaller

boot ext.

241%

smaller

price

3%

lower

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.



log in so that your comment is published immediately
No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

49worldwide automotive brands
1.661different vehicle models
2.384engines
14.865specific cars
Suggest
Suggest