Mitsubishi Outlander 2.4 4WD
Model Year 2010, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.4 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Mitsubishi Outlander 2.4 4WD

The Japanese car was first shown in year 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Mitsubishi. The engine offers a displacement of 2.4 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a cvt gearbox with ∞ gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 190km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.6s and consuming around 9.2 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mitsubishi

2.4 4B12

displacement:
2359
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
170
hp
torque:
232
Nm
Vehicle information - Mitsubishi Outlander
~70% score
produced:
2010. - 2013.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4665
mm
width:
1800
mm
height:
1680
mm
boot:
771 - 1691
l
fuel tank:
63
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

F

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

9.2

l/100km

weight:
1570
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.6
s
top speed:
190
km/h
cons. (urban):
12.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.4
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
204
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

cvt

? gears

average

8.2

l/100km

weight:
1570
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.8
s
top speed:
190
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
190
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Mitsubishi Outlander

EuroNCAP: ~70% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2011. to -
EuroNCAP: 83% score

acceleration

5%

slower

consumption

5%

lower

power

=

equal

length

5%

longer

weight

5%

higher

fuel tank

18%

larger

boot

362%

smaller

boot ext.

8%

smaller

price

21%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2014.  
EuroNCAP: 93% score

acceleration

10%

slower

consumption

21%

lower

power

3%

lower

length

5%

shorter

weight

10%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

37%

smaller

boot ext.

25%

smaller

price

34%

higher

produced from 2011. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 88% score

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

1%

higher

power

2%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

15%

higher

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

62%

smaller

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

14%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

12%

lower

power

13%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

7%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

47%

smaller

boot ext.

10%

smaller

price

34%

higher

produced from 2011. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

1%

lower

power

2%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

9%

higher

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

92%

smaller

boot ext.

22%

smaller

price

16%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments