Ford Mustang Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost
Model Year 2015, S - Segment (Sports car)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
cabriolet
cabriolet
x 2
x 2
Rear
Rear
2.3 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Mustang Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost

The American car first seen in 2015 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Ford. The engine offers a displacement of 2.3 litre matched to a rear wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a sports car with the top speed of 250km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 5.5s and consumping around 8.2 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Ford / Mazda

2.3 L3-VDT EcoBoost

displacement:
2261
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
317
hp
torque:
421
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mustang
72% score
produced:
2015. -
 
body style:
cabriolet
2 door
length:
4784
mm
width:
1916
mm
height:
1394
mm
boot:
332
l
fuel tank:
59
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

8.2

l/100km

weight:
1715
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
5.5
s
top speed:
250
km/h
cons. (urban):
-
l/100km
cons. (highway):
-
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
184
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

F

category

automatic

6 gears

average

9.8

l/100km

weight:
1718
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
5.8
s
top speed:
250
km/h
cons. (urban):
-
l/100km
cons. (highway):
-
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.8
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
225
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
comfort
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Ford Mustang

EuroNCAP: 72% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to -
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

4%

slower

consumption

16%

higher

power

7%

higher

length

7%

shorter

weight

8%

lower

fuel tank

16%

larger

boot

69%

smaller

boot ext.

69%

smaller

price

27%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

53%

faster

consumption

26%

higher

power

44%

higher

length

3%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

31%

larger

boot

89%

smaller

boot ext.

89%

smaller

price

73%

higher

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

5%

faster

consumption

29%

lower

power

1%

higher

length

2%

longer

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

16%

larger

boot

11%

smaller

boot ext.

5%

larger

price

11%

higher

produced from 2012. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

5%

slower

consumption

2%

higher

power

20%

lower

length

9%

shorter

weight

29%

lower

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

19%

smaller

boot ext.

19%

smaller

price

29%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...