Ford S-Max 2.0 EcoBoost
Model Year 2015, M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford S-Max 2.0 EcoBoost

The American car first seen in 2015 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 226km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 8.4s and consumping around 8.9 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mazda / Ford

2.0 LF-VD Turbo

displacement:
1999
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
240
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford S-Max
87% score
produced:
2015. -
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4796
mm
width:
1916
mm
height:
1658
mm
boot:
700 - 2200
l
fuel tank:
70
l

Performance

Automatic gearbox performance

emission

F

category

automatic

6 gears

average

8.9

l/100km

weight:
1704
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
8.4
s
top speed:
226
km/h
cons. (urban):
12.5
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.9
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.9
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
204
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
fuel supply

Safety results for Ford S-Max

EuroNCAP: 87% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

3%

slower

consumption

59%

lower

power

45%

lower

length

4%

shorter

weight

32%

lower

fuel tank

27%

smaller

boot

9%

smaller

boot ext.

241%

smaller

price

177%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 91% score

acceleration

22%

slower

consumption

10%

lower

power

71%

lower

length

5%

shorter

weight

21%

lower

fuel tank

17%

smaller

boot

24%

smaller

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

216%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

13%

slower

consumption

29%

lower

power

54%

lower

length

6%

shorter

weight

19%

lower

fuel tank

17%

smaller

boot

3%

smaller

boot ext.

25%

smaller

price

197%

lower

produced from 2016. to -
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

18%

slower

consumption

59%

lower

power

50%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

19%

lower

fuel tank

32%

smaller

boot

3%

larger

boot ext.

206%

smaller

price

33%

lower

produced from 2016. to 2019.  
EuroNCAP: 94% score

acceleration

100%

slower

consumption

100%

higher

power

20%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

100%

higher

fuel tank

21%

smaller

boot

1%

larger

boot ext.

18%

smaller

price

43%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...