Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4WD
Model Year 2013, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
1.6 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4WD

The American car first seen in 2013 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Ford. The engine offers a displacement of 1.6 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 200km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.7s and consumping around 7.7 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
displacement:
1597
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
185
hp
torque:
240
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Kuga
94% score
produced:
2013. - 2016.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4524
mm
width:
1838
mm
height:
1702
mm
boot:
456 - 1653
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Performance

Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

7.7

l/100km

weight:
1682
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.7
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.2
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.3
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.7
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
179
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Ford Kuga

EuroNCAP: 94% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

13%

slower

consumption

20%

lower

power

36%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

31%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

23%

larger

boot ext.

15%

smaller

price

15%

higher

produced from 2014. to -
EuroNCAP: 93% score

acceleration

18%

faster

consumption

6%

higher

power

23%

higher

length

2%

longer

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

54%

larger

boot ext.

3%

larger

price

42%

higher

produced from 2015. to 2018.  
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

5%

faster

consumption

28%

lower

power

13%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

11%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

3%

larger

boot ext.

12%

smaller

price

9%

higher

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

=

equal

consumption

51%

lower

power

36%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

21%

lower

fuel tank

18%

smaller

boot

10%

larger

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

26%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...