Ford S-Max 2.0 EcoBoost
Model Year 2010, M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford S-Max 2.0 EcoBoost

The American car first seen in 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 240km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 7.6s and consumping around 8.1 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mazda / Ford

2.0 LF-VD Turbo

displacement:
1999
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
240
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford S-Max
~90% score
produced:
2010. - 2015.
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4768
mm
width:
1884
mm
height:
1658
mm
boot:
480 - 1820
l
fuel tank:
70
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

8.1

l/100km

weight:
1558
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.6
s
top speed:
240
km/h
cons. (urban):
11.2
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.4
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.1
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
188
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

8.3

l/100km

weight:
1558
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.9
s
top speed:
235
km/h
cons. (urban):
11.5
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
194
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
fuel supply

Safety results for Ford S-Max

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2011. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 95% score

acceleration

31%

slower

consumption

31%

lower

power

71%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

5%

smaller

boot ext.

21%

smaller

price

7%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

32%

slower

consumption

17%

lower

power

60%

lower

length

4%

shorter

weight

12%

lower

fuel tank

17%

smaller

boot

329%

smaller

boot ext.

23%

smaller

price

17%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

18%

slower

consumption

25%

higher

power

4%

lower

length

3%

longer

weight

23%

higher

fuel tank

13%

larger

boot

13%

larger

boot ext.

7%

larger

price

69%

higher

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 91% score

acceleration

27%

slower

consumption

2%

lower

power

71%

lower

length

4%

shorter

weight

11%

lower

fuel tank

17%

smaller

boot

15%

larger

boot ext.

12%

larger

price

39%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...