Ford Mondeo Wagon 2.0 TDCi
Model Year 2010 (Ford alias), D - Segment (Large family car)

drivers'

5.0

rating

Badges:
wagon
wagon
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Mondeo Wagon 2.0 TDCi

The American car was first shown in year 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a large family car with the top speed of 215km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.1s and consuming around 5.3 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 C

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
163
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mondeo
~90% score
produced:
2010. - 2015.
 
body style:
wagon
5 door
length:
4830
mm
width:
1886
mm
height:
1512
mm
boot:
554 - 1745
l
fuel tank:
70
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

C

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

5.3

l/100km

weight:
1475
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.1
s
top speed:
215
km/h
cons. (urban):
6.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.6
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
139
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

D

category

automatic

6 gears

average

5.6

l/100km

weight:
1492
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.8
s
top speed:
210
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.2
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
149
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics
clutch/DMF

Safety results for Ford Mondeo

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2010. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 81% score

acceleration

12%

slower

consumption

2%

lower

power

=

equal

length

=

equal

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

1%

larger

boot

10%

smaller

boot ext.

19%

smaller

price

39%

lower

produced from 2010. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: 77% score

acceleration

1%

slower

consumption

2%

higher

power

=

equal

length

1%

shorter

weight

=

equal

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

7%

smaller

boot ext.

0%

larger

price

4%

higher

produced from 2012. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 92% score

acceleration

14%

faster

consumption

14%

lower

power

7%

higher

length

1%

shorter

weight

6%

lower

fuel tank

13%

smaller

boot

6%

smaller

boot ext.

5%

smaller

price

41%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

10%

faster

consumption

11%

higher

power

6%

higher

length

1%

shorter

weight

=

equal

fuel tank

6%

smaller

boot

9%

smaller

boot ext.

10%

smaller

price

51%

lower

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: 94% score

acceleration

3%

slower

consumption

4%

lower

power

=

equal

length

4%

shorter

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

29%

smaller

boot ext.

41%

smaller

price

6%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars