Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Model Year 2010 (Ford alias), D - Segment (Large family car)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
hatchback
hatchback
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost

The American car was first shown in year 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a large family car with the top speed of 238km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 7.6s and consuming around 7.6 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mazda / Ford

2.0 LF-VD Turbo

displacement:
1999
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
203
hp
torque:
300
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mondeo
~90% score
produced:
2010. - 2015.
 
body style:
hatchback
5 door
length:
4784
mm
width:
1886
mm
height:
1500
mm
boot:
540 - 1370
l
fuel tank:
70
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

7.6

l/100km

weight:
1469
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.6
s
top speed:
238
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
176
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

7.7

l/100km

weight:
1469
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.9
s
top speed:
232
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.7
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
179
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
clutch/DMF

Safety results for Ford Mondeo

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2011. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

7%

faster

consumption

21%

lower

power

4%

higher

length

2%

shorter

weight

=

equal

fuel tank

8%

smaller

boot

13%

smaller

boot ext.

40%

smaller

price

57%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: 77% score

acceleration

25%

slower

consumption

7%

lower

power

35%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

10%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

6%

smaller

boot ext.

19%

larger

price

4%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

14%

slower

consumption

11%

higher

power

19%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

6%

lower

fuel tank

6%

smaller

boot

20%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

51%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 93% score

acceleration

12%

faster

consumption

23%

lower

power

8%

higher

length

3%

shorter

weight

9%

lower

fuel tank

40%

smaller

boot

8%

larger

boot ext.

13%

larger

price

13%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars