Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Model Year 2010, D - Segment (Large family car)

drivers'

4.8

rating

Badges:
sedan
sedan
x 4
x 4
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost

The American car first seen in 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a large family car with the top speed of 238km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 7.6s and consumping around 7.6 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mazda / Ford

2.0 LF-VD Turbo

displacement:
1999
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
203
hp
torque:
300
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mondeo
~90% score
produced:
2010. - 2015.
 
body style:
sedan
4 door
length:
4844
mm
width:
1886
mm
height:
1500
mm
boot:
554
l
fuel tank:
70
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

7.6

l/100km

weight:
1469
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.6
s
top speed:
238
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
176
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

7.7

l/100km

weight:
1469
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.9
s
top speed:
232
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.7
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
179
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
clutch/DMF

Safety results for Ford Mondeo

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2010. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 81% score

acceleration

20%

slower

consumption

13%

lower

power

30%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

1%

larger

boot

26%

smaller

boot ext.

26%

smaller

price

29%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: 77% score

acceleration

24%

slower

consumption

10%

lower

power

35%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

10%

smaller

boot ext.

10%

smaller

price

46%

higher

produced from 2012. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 92% score

acceleration

16%

slower

consumption

29%

lower

power

23%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

14%

lower

fuel tank

13%

smaller

boot

13%

smaller

boot ext.

13%

smaller

price

56%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...