Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi
Model Year 2003 (Ford Focus C-Max), M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

4.4

rating

Badges:
MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi

The American car first seen in 2003 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 200km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.6s and consumping around 5.6 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 BTED4 / RHR

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
136
hp
torque:
320
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford C-Max
~70% score
produced:
2003. - 2007.
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4333
mm
width:
1825
mm
height:
1595
mm
boot:
550 - 1620
l
fuel tank:
55
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

D

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

5.6

l/100km

weight:
1427
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.6
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.5
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
148
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics

Safety results for Ford C-Max

EuroNCAP: ~70% occupant safety

Related articles

author: AutoManiac date: 2016-05-16

Back in the 80's it was virtually impossible to describe any Volvo car without using insanely high number of superlatives. The MOST safe, the MOST reliable, the MOST comfortable... Still, they were puzzled on how to reach to a young drivers' hearts, creating the MOST interesting...

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2002. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

29%

slower

consumption

20%

higher

power

20%

lower

length

4%

longer

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

30%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

47%

lower

produced from 2003. to 2005.  
EuroNCAP: ~50% score

acceleration

31%

slower

consumption

11%

higher

power

35%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

=

equal

boot ext.

5%

larger

price

13%

higher

produced from 2004. to 2009.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

4%

slower

consumption

5%

higher

power

3%

higher

length

3%

longer

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

3%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

smaller

price

36%

higher

produced from 2004. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

24%

slower

consumption

10%

higher

power

17%

lower

length

1%

longer

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

30%

smaller

boot ext.

4%

smaller

price

44%

higher

produced from 2003. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

9%

slower

consumption

7%

higher

power

=

equal

length

1%

longer

weight

7%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

21%

larger

boot ext.

19%

larger

price

40%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...