administrators / moderators access

username / e-mail:

Search this website:
Basic information
click to

2013. - 2016. Production 2013. -
M - MPV Vehicle class M - MPV
MPV, 5 door Body style MPV, 5 door
Front Wheel drive Front
Dimensons & Volumes
4428 mm
Length 4365 mm
1826 mm
Width 1837 mm
1610 mm
Height 1639 mm
537 liters
Boot (min) 432 liters
537 liters
Boot (max) 1241 liters
55 liters
Fuel tank 60 liters
Peugeot / BMW
1.6 Prince EP6CDTM
Peugeot / BMW
1.6 Prince EP6CDT
Petrol Fuel Petrol
4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Configuration 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder
Turbo Aspiration Turbo
1598 cc
Displacement 1598 cc
165 hp
Power 156 hp
240 Nm
Torque 240 Nm
Performance (manual gearbox)
manual gearbox - gears
manual gearbox - 6 gears
Vehicle weight 1434 kg
Acc. 0-100 8.9 s
Top speed 202 km/h
Cons. (urban) 9.3 l/100km
Cons. (highway) 5.5 l/100km
Cons. (average) 6.9 l/100km
CO2 emissions 159 g/km
Performance (automatic gearbox)
automatic - 6 gears
automatic - 6 gears
1285 kg
Vehicle weight 1455 kg
8.4 s
Acc. 0-100 10.5 s
210 km/h
Top speed 202 km/h
7.3 l/100km
Cons. (urban) 10.7 l/100km
4.6 l/100km
Cons. (highway) 6.0 l/100km
5.6 l/100km
Cons. (average) 7.7 l/100km
129 g/km
CO2 emissions 178 g/km
10990 EUR
Price from 11000 EUR
Virtual Adviser's™ opinion


Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the mpv segment and utilize the same 5-door MPV body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. Both the engines are Peugeot-engineered . The first one has a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 165hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 156hp one.


The first thing to look into here would be the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests performed on the two cars. Good thing is that both vehicles got tested, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Still, apart from the official crash test results there are other things we need to be aware of. Both vehicles belong to the mpv segment, which is generally a good thing safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, 3008 offers a considerable difference of 12% more metal.


Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that Peugeot does have a slight advantage, at least on all of the models level. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of Citroen with an average rating of 4.2, and models under the Peugeot badge with 4.3 out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. That apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as C4 Picasso rank it on average as 5.0, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 4.8 out of 5.

Performance & Fuel economy

Citroen is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in 0.5 seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 210 kilometers per hour, 8km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be C4 Picasso, averaging around 5.6 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (50 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 23% difference compared to 3008.


Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, 3008 offers significantly better overall protection, taking the lead here. From there things take a different direction, with Citroen offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! I believe that, when we take all into account, we have only one winner here - the Citroen. Anyway, that's the most objective conclusion I could've came up with and it's based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser™, among more than 12.000 different ones in our database.
Copyright © 2015 - 2019 - All rights reserved.
Powered by Gama1 Solutions