Chrysler Crossfire Roadster 3.2i V6
Model Year 2003, S - Segment (Sports car)

drivers'

3.0

rating

cabriolet
cabriolet
x 2
x 2
Front
Front
3.2 L6 18v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Chrysler Crossfire Roadster 3.2i V6

The American car was first shown in year 2003 and powered by a 6 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Mercedes Benz. The engine offers a displacement of 3.2 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 5 gears. Vehicle in question is a sports car with the top speed of 242km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 6.5s and consuming around 10.4 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mercedes Benz

3.2 V6 M112 E32

displacement:
3199
cc
configuration:
6 - Inline
 
valves:
18, 3 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
218
hp
torque:
310
Nm
Vehicle information - Chrysler Crossfire
not tested
produced:
2003. - 2008.
 
body style:
cabriolet
2 door
length:
4058
mm
width:
1766
mm
height:
1315
mm
boot:
104 - 190
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

G

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

10.4

l/100km

weight:
1385
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
6.5
s
top speed:
242
km/h
cons. (urban):
15.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.4
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
250
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

F

category

automatic

5 gears

average

10.1

l/100km

weight:
1395
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
6.5
s
top speed:
242
km/h
cons. (urban):
14.3
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.1
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
243
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Chrysler Crossfire

EuroNCAP: not tested

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2005. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

10%

higher

power

16%

higher

length

8%

longer

weight

17%

higher

fuel tank

14%

larger

boot

56%

larger

boot ext.

19%

larger

price

95%

lower

produced from 2004. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

8%

lower

power

16%

higher

length

16%

longer

weight

18%

higher

fuel tank

14%

larger

boot

65%

larger

boot ext.

46%

larger

price

39%

higher

produced from 2002. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

2%

slower

consumption

11%

higher

power

27%

higher

length

15%

longer

weight

21%

higher

fuel tank

20%

larger

boot

66%

larger

boot ext.

38%

larger

price

53%

higher

produced from 2003. to 2005.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

21%

slower

consumption

7%

higher

power

=

equal

length

13%

longer

weight

14%

higher

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

73%

larger

boot ext.

51%

larger

price

163%

lower

produced from 2006. to 2008.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

2%

slower

consumption

2%

higher

power

20%

higher

length

11%

longer

weight

19%

higher

fuel tank

25%

larger

boot

56%

larger

boot ext.

44%

larger

price

35%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments