Suzuki Swift 1.6 Sport (136hp)
Model Year 2010, B - Segment (City car)

drivers'

4.5

rating

Badges:
hatchback
hatchback
x 3
x 3
Front
Front
1.6 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Suzuki Swift 1.6 Sport (136hp)

The Japanese car was first shown in year 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Suzuki. The engine offers a displacement of 1.6 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a city car with the top speed of 195km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 8.7s and consuming around 6.4 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
displacement:
1586
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
136
hp
torque:
160
Nm
Vehicle information - Suzuki Swift
94% score
produced:
2010. - 2017.
 
body style:
hatchback
3 door
length:
3850
mm
width:
1695
mm
height:
1510
mm
boot:
204 - 864
l
fuel tank:
42
l

Check vehicle history

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

D

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

6.4

l/100km

weight:
1015
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
8.7
s
top speed:
195
km/h
cons. (urban):
8.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.2
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.4
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
147
g/km

Latest vehicles added by our users

There are currently no such vehicles in our community

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Suzuki Swift

EuroNCAP: 94% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2008. to -
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

4%

faster

consumption

14%

lower

power

1%

lower

length

5%

longer

weight

11%

higher

fuel tank

7%

larger

boot

24%

larger

boot ext.

9%

larger

price

53%

lower

produced from 2010. to 2014.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

4%

slower

consumption

19%

lower

power

13%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

3%

higher

fuel tank

5%

smaller

boot

28%

smaller

boot ext.

27%

smaller

price

19%

higher

produced from 2009. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

7%

higher

power

5%

lower

length

4%

longer

weight

9%

higher

fuel tank

24%

larger

boot

29%

larger

boot ext.

17%

larger

price

70%

lower

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.



log in so that your comment is published immediately
No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

49worldwide automotive brands
1.661different vehicle models
2.384engines
14.865specific cars
Suggest
Suggest