Subaru Forester 2.5 XT AWD
Model Year 2005 (Subaru alias), J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.8

rating

suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.5 B4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Subaru Forester 2.5 XT AWD

The Japanese car was first shown in year 2005 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Subaru. The engine offers a displacement of 2.5 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a automatic gearbox with 4 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 216km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 6.0s and consuming around 10.7 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Subaru

2.5 EJ255

displacement:
2457
cc
configuration:
4 - Boxer
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
230
hp
torque:
320
Nm
Vehicle information - Subaru Forester
not tested
produced:
2005. - 2008.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4485
mm
width:
1735
mm
height:
1590
mm
boot:
387 - 1629
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

G

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

10.7

l/100km

weight:
1460
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
6.0
s
top speed:
216
km/h
cons. (urban):
14.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
8.4
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.7
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
254
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

G

category

automatic

4 gears

average

10.5

l/100km

weight:
1485
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
7.6
s
top speed:
214
km/h
cons. (urban):
14.3
l/100km
cons. (highway):
8.3
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.5
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
250
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
exhaust EGR/DPF

Safety results for Subaru Forester

EuroNCAP: not tested

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2004. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

28%

slower

consumption

5%

lower

power

31%

lower

length

4%

shorter

weight

5%

higher

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

40%

larger

boot ext.

12%

larger

price

41%

lower

produced from 2007. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

43%

slower

consumption

27%

lower

power

64%

lower

length

4%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

6%

larger

boot ext.

8%

smaller

price

4%

higher

produced from 2005. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

49%

slower

consumption

19%

lower

power

36%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

9%

larger

boot

3%

larger

boot ext.

18%

smaller

price

13%

lower

produced from 2006. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

43%

slower

consumption

24%

lower

power

51%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

14%

larger

boot ext.

7%

larger

price

2%

higher

produced from 2006. to 2011.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

44%

slower

consumption

23%

lower

power

35%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

18%

smaller

boot

16%

smaller

boot ext.

28%

smaller

price

36%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars