Mitsubishi Pajero 3.2 DI-D
Model Year 1999 (Mitsubishi Montero / Shogun), J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

4.6

rating

Badges:
suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
3.2 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Mitsubishi Pajero 3.2 DI-D

The Japanese car was first shown in year 1999 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Mitsubishi. The engine offers a displacement of 3.2 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a automatic gearbox with 5 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 170km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 12.0s and consuming around 9.5 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mitsubishi

3.2 4M41 LP

displacement:
3200
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
163
hp
torque:
351
Nm
Vehicle information - Mitsubishi Pajero
not tested
produced:
1999. - 2006.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4795
mm
width:
1875
mm
height:
1855
mm
boot:
1080 - 2050
l
fuel tank:
90
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

G

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

9.5

l/100km

weight:
2045
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
12.0
s
top speed:
170
km/h
cons. (urban):
12.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.9
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.5
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
251
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

G

category

automatic

5 gears

average

10.5

l/100km

weight:
2045
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
13.8
s
top speed:
170
km/h
cons. (urban):
13.3
l/100km
cons. (highway):
8.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.5
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
278
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Mitsubishi Pajero

EuroNCAP: not tested

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2002. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

18%

slower

consumption

23%

lower

power

16%

lower

length

5%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

13%

smaller

boot

122%

smaller

boot ext.

11%

smaller

price

150%

lower

produced from 2001. to 2004.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

8%

slower

consumption

9%

lower

power

=

equal

length

2%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

20%

smaller

boot

44%

smaller

boot ext.

2%

smaller

price

56%

lower

produced from 1998. to 2004.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

22%

slower

consumption

12%

higher

power

3%

lower

length

4%

longer

weight

9%

higher

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

62%

smaller

boot ext.

10%

larger

price

31%

higher

produced from 1998. to 2005.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

29%

slower

consumption

8%

lower

power

36%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

10%

lower

fuel tank

23%

smaller

boot

4%

larger

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

11%

higher

produced from 2002. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

=

equal

power

=

equal

length

1%

longer

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

74%

smaller

boot ext.

11%

smaller

price

57%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.565different vehicle models
2.275engines
14.080specific cars