Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 4x4
Model Year 2016, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 180 4x4

The American car first seen in 2016 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a dual clutch gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 202km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.2s and consumping around 5.2 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 FC

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
180
hp
torque:
400
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Kuga
94% score
produced:
2016. -
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4531
mm
width:
1838
mm
height:
1703
mm
boot:
456 - 1603
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

C

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

5.2

l/100km

weight:
1702
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.2
s
top speed:
202
km/h
cons. (urban):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
135
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

C

category

dual clutch

6 gears

average

5.2

l/100km

weight:
1716
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.0
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
5.5
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.9
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
134
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
exhaust EGR/DPF

Safety results for Ford Kuga

EuroNCAP: 94% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

2%

slower

consumption

7%

higher

power

1%

lower

length

2%

longer

weight

11%

lower

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

17%

larger

boot ext.

19%

larger

price

11%

lower

produced from 2015. to 2018.  
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

12%

higher

power

3%

higher

length

1%

shorter

weight

7%

lower

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

7%

larger

boot ext.

8%

smaller

price

7%

lower

produced from 2015. to 2018.  
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

12%

slower

consumption

6%

lower

power

40%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

6%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

3%

larger

boot ext.

8%

smaller

price

35%

lower

produced from 2017. to -
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

14%

slower

consumption

2%

higher

power

1%

lower

length

3%

longer

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

14%

larger

boot ext.

4%

larger

price

44%

higher

produced from 2017. to -
EuroNCAP: 88% score

acceleration

3%

slower

consumption

2%

lower

power

20%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

11%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

6%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

smaller

price

2%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...