Ford Mustang Convertible GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
Model Year 2015 (Ford alias), S - Segment (Sports car)

drivers'

4.8

rating

cabriolet
cabriolet
x 2
x 2
Rear
Rear
5.0 V8 32v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford Mustang Convertible GT 5.0 Ti-VCT V8

The American car was first shown in year 2015 and powered by a 8 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Ford. The engine offers a displacement of 5.0 litre matched to a rear wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a sports car with the top speed of 250km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 4.8s and consuming around 13.6 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Ford

5.0 Coyote

displacement:
4951
cc
configuration:
8 - V config
 
valves:
32, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
421
hp
torque:
530
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mustang
72% score
produced:
2015. -
 
body style:
cabriolet
2 door
length:
4784
mm
width:
1916
mm
height:
1394
mm
boot:
332
l
fuel tank:
59
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

G

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

13.6

l/100km

weight:
1786
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
4.8
s
top speed:
250
km/h
cons. (urban):
-
l/100km
cons. (highway):
-
l/100km
cons. (average):
13.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
306
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

G

category

automatic

6 gears

average

12.8

l/100km

weight:
1792
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
5.2
s
top speed:
250
km/h
cons. (urban):
-
l/100km
cons. (highway):
-
l/100km
cons. (average):
12.8
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
289
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Ford Mustang

EuroNCAP: 72% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to -
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

24%

faster

consumption

20%

lower

power

15%

higher

length

7%

shorter

weight

8%

lower

fuel tank

16%

larger

boot

69%

smaller

boot ext.

69%

smaller

price

31%

higher

produced from 2010. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

37%

faster

consumption

3%

higher

power

26%

higher

length

3%

shorter

weight

10%

lower

fuel tank

31%

larger

boot

89%

smaller

boot ext.

89%

smaller

price

77%

higher

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

13%

faster

consumption

44%

lower

power

6%

higher

length

2%

longer

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

16%

larger

boot

11%

smaller

boot ext.

5%

larger

price

38%

lower

produced from 2012. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

7%

faster

consumption

37%

lower

power

12%

lower

length

9%

shorter

weight

28%

lower

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

19%

smaller

boot ext.

19%

smaller

price

38%

higher

produced from 2020. to -
EuroNCAP: 97% score

acceleration

=

equal

consumption

54%

lower

power

13%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

7%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

14%

larger

boot ext.

14%

larger

price

26%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars