Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi 150
Model Year 2015, M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi 150

The American car first seen in 2015 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a dual clutch gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 202km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.8s and consumping around 4.6 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 FD

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
150
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Grand C-Max
76% score
produced:
2015. -
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4519
mm
width:
1828
mm
height:
1684
mm
boot:
475 - 1787
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

B

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

4.6

l/100km

weight:
1577
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.8
s
top speed:
202
km/h
cons. (urban):
5.2
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.2
l/100km
cons. (average):
4.6
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
119
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

C

category

dual clutch

6 gears

average

5.0

l/100km

weight:
1605
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.7
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
5.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.6
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.0
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
129
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Ford Grand C-Max

EuroNCAP: 76% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

=

equal

consumption

10%

lower

power

=

equal

length

2%

longer

weight

12%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

26%

larger

boot ext.

177%

smaller

price

112%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 91% score

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

7%

lower

power

16%

lower

length

1%

longer

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

16%

larger

boot ext.

13%

larger

price

141%

lower

produced from 2016. to 2019.  
EuroNCAP: 94% score

acceleration

12%

slower

consumption

18%

higher

power

15%

lower

length

3%

longer

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

33%

larger

boot ext.

4%

larger

price

10%

lower

produced from 2016. to -
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

=

equal

consumption

12%

lower

power

=

equal

length

2%

longer

weight

10%

lower

fuel tank

5%

smaller

boot

27%

larger

boot ext.

18%

larger

price

4%

lower

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: 88% score

acceleration

5%

faster

consumption

2%

lower

power

=

equal

length

=

equal

weight

7%

lower

fuel tank

3%

smaller

boot

30%

larger

boot ext.

10%

larger

price

72%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...