Ford Mondeo Wagon 2.0 TDCi 150
Model Year 2015, D - Segment (Large family car)

drivers'

4.8

rating

Badges:
wagon
wagon
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Mondeo Wagon 2.0 TDCi 150

The American car was first shown in year 2015 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a dual clutch gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a large family car with the top speed of 210km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.4s and consuming around 4.5 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 FD

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
150
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Mondeo
86% score
produced:
2015. - 2019.
 
body style:
wagon
5 door
length:
4867
mm
width:
1852
mm
height:
1501
mm
boot:
525 - 1630
l
fuel tank:
62
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

B

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

4.5

l/100km

weight:
1597
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.4
s
top speed:
210
km/h
cons. (urban):
5.1
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.1
l/100km
cons. (average):
4.5
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
117
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

C

category

dual clutch

6 gears

average

4.9

l/100km

weight:
1601
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.0
s
top speed:
208
km/h
cons. (urban):
5.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
4.9
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
128
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
fuel supply

Safety results for Ford Mondeo

EuroNCAP: 86% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2014. to 2018.  
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

3%

faster

consumption

10%

lower

power

=

equal

length

1%

shorter

weight

7%

lower

fuel tank

14%

larger

boot

6%

larger

boot ext.

2%

smaller

price

27%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 94% score

acceleration

15%

slower

consumption

15%

lower

power

7%

lower

length

1%

longer

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

11%

larger

boot

3%

larger

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

65%

lower

produced from 2015. to 2018.  
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

2%

faster

consumption

10%

lower

power

=

equal

length

3%

shorter

weight

3%

lower

fuel tank

15%

smaller

boot

4%

smaller

boot ext.

8%

smaller

price

14%

higher

produced from 2015. to 2020.  
EuroNCAP: 86% score

acceleration

1%

slower

consumption

2%

lower

power

6%

higher

length

=

equal

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

19%

smaller

boot

7%

smaller

boot ext.

3%

larger

price

13%

higher

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

8%

slower

consumption

2%

lower

power

6%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

3%

lower

fuel tank

11%

larger

boot

5%

larger

boot ext.

3%

larger

price

24%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.565different vehicle models
2.275engines
14.080specific cars