Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4WD
Model Year 2013, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

5.0

rating

Badges:
suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4WD

The American car was first shown in year 2013 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 198km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.9s and consuming around 5.9 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 C

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
163
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Kuga
94% score
produced:
2013. - 2016.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4524
mm
width:
1838
mm
height:
1702
mm
boot:
456 - 1653
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

D

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

5.9

l/100km

weight:
1692
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.9
s
top speed:
198
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.2
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.1
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.9
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
154
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

6.2

l/100km

weight:
1707
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.4
s
top speed:
196
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
162
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics
clutch/DMF

Safety results for Ford Kuga

EuroNCAP: 94% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2013. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

1%

slower

consumption

=

equal

power

12%

higher

length

3%

shorter

weight

13%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

23%

larger

boot ext.

15%

smaller

price

11%

lower

produced from 2014. to -
EuroNCAP: 93% score

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

31%

lower

power

9%

lower

length

2%

longer

weight

INF%

lower

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

54%

larger

boot ext.

3%

larger

price

30%

higher

produced from 2015. to 2018.  
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

20%

lower

power

26%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

3%

larger

boot ext.

12%

smaller

price

3%

higher

produced from 2015. to -
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

8%

faster

consumption

26%

lower

power

9%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

11%

lower

fuel tank

18%

smaller

boot

10%

larger

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

5%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.565different vehicle models
2.275engines
14.080specific cars