Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi AWD
Model Year 2008, J - Segment (SUV)

drivers'

3.8

rating

Badges:
suv
suv
x 5
x 5
4 x 4
4 x 4
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi AWD

The American car was first shown in year 2008 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a suv with the top speed of 195km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.6s and consuming around 6.0 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 C

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
163
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Kuga
~90% score
produced:
2008. - 2013.
 
body style:
suv
5 door
length:
4443
mm
width:
1842
mm
height:
1677
mm
boot:
410 - 1405
l
fuel tank:
58
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

D

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

6.0

l/100km

weight:
1514
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.6
s
top speed:
195
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.1
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.0
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
159
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

6 gears

average

6.8

l/100km

weight:
1572
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.9
s
top speed:
192
km/h
cons. (urban):
8.5
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.8
l/100km
cons. (average):
6.8
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
179
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics
clutch/DMF

Safety results for Ford Kuga

EuroNCAP: ~90% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2009. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

16%

faster

consumption

33%

lower

power

=

equal

length

=

equal

weight

3%

lower

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

2%

larger

boot ext.

4%

smaller

price

21%

higher

produced from 2007. to 2012.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

3%

slower

consumption

10%

higher

power

4%

lower

length

4%

longer

weight

10%

higher

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

123%

smaller

boot ext.

17%

larger

price

10%

lower

produced from 2010. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: 90% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

=

equal

power

12%

higher

length

1%

shorter

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

5%

smaller

boot

31%

larger

boot ext.

2%

larger

price

18%

higher

produced from 2007. to 2011.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

11%

slower

consumption

20%

higher

power

9%

lower

length

3%

longer

weight

13%

higher

fuel tank

11%

larger

boot

11%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

44%

lower

produced from 2006. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

3%

faster

consumption

14%

higher

power

8%

higher

length

1%

shorter

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

9%

larger

boot ext.

20%

larger

price

28%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

Ok, this is cool, now what