Ford C-Max 2.0 16V
Model Year 2003 (Ford Focus C-Max), M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford C-Max 2.0 16V

The American car first seen in 2003 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a automatic gearbox with 4 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 203km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.8s and consumping around 7.3 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
displacement:
1999
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
145
hp
torque:
185
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford C-Max
~70% score
produced:
2003. - 2007.
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4333
mm
width:
1825
mm
height:
1595
mm
boot:
550 - 1620
l
fuel tank:
55
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

7.3

l/100km

weight:
1320
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.8
s
top speed:
203
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.0
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.6
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
176
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

4 gears

average

8.1

l/100km

weight:
1335
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
11.2
s
top speed:
192
km/h
cons. (urban):
11.3
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.2
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.1
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
194
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics
cooling sys.
exhaust EGR/DPF

Safety results for Ford C-Max

EuroNCAP: ~70% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2002. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

18%

slower

consumption

10%

higher

power

15%

lower

length

4%

longer

weight

3%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

30%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

42%

lower

produced from 2003. to 2005.  
EuroNCAP: ~50% score

acceleration

20%

faster

consumption

28%

higher

power

28%

higher

length

=

equal

weight

8%

higher

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

=

equal

boot ext.

5%

larger

price

65%

lower

produced from 2004. to 2009.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

10%

faster

consumption

9%

higher

power

3%

higher

length

3%

longer

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

3%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

smaller

price

18%

higher

produced from 2004. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

9%

slower

consumption

5%

higher

power

12%

lower

length

1%

longer

weight

1%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

30%

smaller

boot ext.

4%

smaller

price

35%

higher

produced from 2003. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

8%

higher

power

3%

higher

length

1%

longer

weight

11%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

21%

larger

boot ext.

19%

larger

price

2%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...