administrators / moderators access

username / e-mail:
password:
   
Useful?

Search this website:
Basic information
VS
Make
click to

compare
Make
Model
Model
Variant
Variant
Engine
Engine
Badges
2013. - 2016. Production 2013. -
M - MPV Vehicle class M - MPV
MPV, 5 door Body style MPV, 5 door
Front Wheel drive Front
Safety
Dimensons & Volumes
4428 mm
Length 4525 mm
1826 mm
Width 1805 mm
1610 mm
Height 1610 mm
537 liters
Boot (min) 492 liters
537 liters
Boot (max) 1650 liters
55 liters
Fuel tank 58 liters
Engine
Peugeot / BMW
1.6 Prince EP6CDTM
Petrol Fuel Petrol
4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Configuration 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder
Turbo Aspiration Naturally Aspir.
1598 cc
Displacement 1591 cc
165 hp
Power 136 hp
240 Nm
Torque 165 Nm
Performance (manual gearbox)
manual gearbox - gears
manual gearbox - 6 gears
kg
Vehicle weight 1383 kg
s
Acc. 0-100 11.3 s
km/h
Top speed 185 km/h
l/100km
Cons. (urban) 8.4 l/100km
l/100km
Cons. (highway) 5.3 l/100km
l/100km
Cons. (average) 6.4 l/100km
g/km
CO2 emissions 149 g/km
Performance (automatic gearbox)
automatic - 6 gears
1285 kg
Vehicle weight kg
8.4 s
Acc. 0-100 s
210 km/h
Top speed km/h
7.3 l/100km
Cons. (urban) l/100km
4.6 l/100km
Cons. (highway) l/100km
5.6 l/100km
Cons. (average) l/100km
129 g/km
CO2 emissions g/km
Expenses
10990 EUR
Price from 21990 EUR
Virtual Adviser's™ opinion

Overview

Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the mpv segment and utilize the same 5-door MPV body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. The first one has a Peugeot-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 165hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 136hp engine designed by Hyundai.

Safety

The first thing to look into here would be the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests performed on the two cars. Good thing is that both vehicles got tested, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the mpv segment, which is generally a good thing safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, the Korean car offers a marginal difference of 8% more metal.

Reliability

Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, at least on all of the models level. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of Citroen with an average rating of 4.2, and models under the KIA badge with 4.5 out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. That apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as the French car rank it on average as 5.0, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 4.5 out of 5.

Performance & Fuel economy

Citroen is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in 2.9 seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 210 kilometers per hour, 25km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be the French car, averaging around 5.6 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (50 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 14% difference compared to the Korean car.

Verdict

Citroen appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the Korean car offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. From there things take a different direction, with Citroen being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! All together, there's not much more to say, in this case I wouldn't even consider anything but Citroen. Anyway, that's the most objective conclusion I could've came up with and it's based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles.
Copyright © 2015 - 2019 automaniac.org - All rights reserved.
Powered by Gama1 Solutions