Chrysler Sebring 2.0i 16v
Model Year 2003, D - Segment (Large family car)

drivers'

3.5

rating

sedan
sedan
x 4
x 4
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Chrysler Sebring 2.0i 16v

The American car was first shown in year 2003 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Chrysler. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a automatic gearbox with 4 gears. Vehicle in question is a large family car with the top speed of 200km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 11.8s and consuming around 8.5 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Chrysler

2.0 ECC DOHC

displacement:
1995
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
140
hp
torque:
188
Nm
Vehicle information - Chrysler Sebring
not tested
produced:
2003. - 2007.
 
body style:
sedan
4 door
length:
4844
mm
width:
1792
mm
height:
1394
mm
boot:
453
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

F

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

8.5

l/100km

weight:
1410
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
11.8
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
11.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.5
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
202
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

F

category

automatic

4 gears

average

9.4

l/100km

weight:
1440
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
s
top speed:
180
km/h
cons. (urban):
12.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.4
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
243
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
mechanics
electrics

Safety results for Chrysler Sebring

EuroNCAP: not tested

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2004. to 2008.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

30%

faster

consumption

5%

lower

power

=

equal

length

4%

shorter

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

9%

larger

boot

11%

smaller

boot ext.

11%

smaller

price

67%

lower

produced from 2002. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

24%

faster

consumption

5%

lower

power

7%

higher

length

5%

shorter

weight

1%

lower

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

7%

smaller

boot ext.

7%

smaller

price

33%

lower

produced from 2003. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

3%

faster

consumption

1%

higher

power

3%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

3%

larger

boot

17%

smaller

boot ext.

17%

smaller

price

33%

lower

produced from 2004. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

19%

faster

consumption

6%

lower

power

8%

lower

length

6%

shorter

weight

5%

lower

fuel tank

14%

larger

boot

2%

larger

boot ext.

37%

larger

price

29%

higher

produced from 2001. to 2005.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

27%

faster

consumption

18%

lower

power

2%

higher

length

8%

shorter

weight

9%

lower

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

3%

smaller

boot ext.

3%

smaller

price

18%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.565different vehicle models
2.275engines
14.080specific cars