Chevrolet Lacetti 1.6
Model Year 2002 (Chevrolet Nubira), C - Segment (Small family car)

drivers'

3.0

rating

hatchback
hatchback
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
1.6 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Chevrolet Lacetti 1.6

The American car first seen in 2002 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Chevrolet. The engine offers a displacement of 1.6 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a automatic gearbox with 4 gears. Vehicle in question is a small family car with the top speed of 187km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 10.7s and consumping around 7.1 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Chevrolet

1.6 E-Tec 16v

displacement:
1598
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
114
hp
torque:
153
Nm
Vehicle information - Chevrolet Lacetti
not tested
produced:
2002. - 2010.
 
body style:
hatchback
5 door
length:
4295
mm
width:
1725
mm
height:
1445
mm
boot:
275 - 1045
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

7.1

l/100km

weight:
1150
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.7
s
top speed:
187
km/h
cons. (urban):
9.1
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.1
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
178
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

automatic

4 gears

average

8.1

l/100km

weight:
1160
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
11.5
s
top speed:
175
km/h
cons. (urban):
11.2
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.2
l/100km
cons. (average):
8.1
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
197
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics

Safety results for Chevrolet Lacetti

EuroNCAP: not tested

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2008. to -
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

2%

faster

consumption

13%

higher

power

3%

higher

length

=

equal

weight

15%

higher

fuel tank

5%

smaller

boot

21%

larger

boot ext.

199%

smaller

price

53%

higher

produced from 2003. to 2008.  
EuroNCAP: ~50% score

acceleration

3%

slower

consumption

1%

lower

power

9%

lower

length

1%

longer

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

20%

larger

boot ext.

203%

smaller

price

21%

higher

produced from 2003. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

4%

faster

consumption

3%

lower

power

9%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

13%

lower

fuel tank

33%

smaller

boot

14%

larger

boot ext.

22%

smaller

price

2%

higher

produced from 2000. to 2002.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

9%

faster

consumption

1%

lower

power

7%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

8%

lower

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

21%

larger

boot ext.

14%

larger

price

106%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments

See also...