Chevrolet Tacuma 2.0
Model Year 2000 (Chevrolet alias), M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Chevrolet Tacuma 2.0

The American car was first shown in year 2000 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Chevrolet. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a automatic gearbox with 4 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 180km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 10.3s and consuming around 9.0 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Chevrolet

2.0 E-Tech II 16v

displacement:
1998
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
121
hp
torque:
176
Nm
Vehicle information - Chevrolet Tacuma
not tested
produced:
2000. - 2009.
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4350
mm
width:
1755
mm
height:
1580
mm
boot:
347 - 1847
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

F

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

9.0

l/100km

weight:
1281
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.3
s
top speed:
180
km/h
cons. (urban):
12.0
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.2
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.0
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
236
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

G

category

automatic

4 gears

average

10.8

l/100km

weight:
1296
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
11.7
s
top speed:
173
km/h
cons. (urban):
15.1
l/100km
cons. (highway):
8.2
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.8
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
265
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Chevrolet Tacuma

EuroNCAP: not tested

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 1998. to 2004.  
EuroNCAP: ~50% score

acceleration

18%

slower

consumption

5%

lower

power

17%

lower

length

9%

shorter

weight

=

equal

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

19%

larger

boot ext.

42%

smaller

price

193%

lower

produced from 2002. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

14%

slower

consumption

11%

lower

power

4%

higher

length

3%

longer

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

18%

larger

boot ext.

13%

smaller

price

120%

lower

produced from 2000. to 2004.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

24%

lower

power

11%

higher

length

2%

shorter

weight

=

equal

fuel tank

11%

smaller

boot

37%

larger

boot ext.

13%

larger

price

340%

lower

produced from 2001. to 2008.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

9%

slower

consumption

6%

lower

power

3%

higher

length

8%

shorter

weight

2%

lower

fuel tank

9%

smaller

boot

2%

larger

boot ext.

44%

smaller

price

47%

lower

produced from 2000. to 2003.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

7%

slower

consumption

16%

lower

power

11%

higher

length

2%

shorter

weight

8%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

21%

larger

boot ext.

5%

larger

price

132%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars