Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCI
Model Year 2010 (Ford alias), M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
2.0 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Diesel
Diesel

Basic info on Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCI

The American car was first shown in year 2010 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo diesel unit, produced by Peugeot. The engine offers a displacement of 2.0 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 200km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 10.1s and consuming around 5.3 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Peugeot / Ford

2.0 DW10 BTED4 / RHR

displacement:
1997
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Diesel
 
power:
140
hp
torque:
340
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford Grand C-Max
96% score
produced:
2010. - 2015.
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4520
mm
width:
1828
mm
height:
1684
mm
boot:
475 - 1742
l
fuel tank:
60
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

C

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

5.3

l/100km

weight:
1475
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.1
s
top speed:
200
km/h
cons. (urban):
6.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.5
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
139
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

D

category

automatic

6 gears

average

5.8

l/100km

weight:
1534
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.5
s
top speed:
198
km/h
cons. (urban):
7.4
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.8
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
154
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
electrics
air supply

Safety results for Ford Grand C-Max

EuroNCAP: 96% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2012. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 72% score

acceleration

13%

slower

consumption

20%

lower

power

31%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

25%

lower

fuel tank

20%

smaller

boot

43%

larger

boot ext.

33%

larger

price

10%

lower

produced from 2012. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

26%

slower

consumption

18%

lower

power

56%

lower

length

4%

shorter

weight

25%

lower

fuel tank

20%

smaller

boot

41%

larger

boot ext.

42%

larger

price

11%

higher

produced from 2009. to 2013.  
EuroNCAP: 91% score

acceleration

9%

faster

consumption

20%

higher

power

13%

higher

length

1%

longer

weight

7%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

26%

larger

boot ext.

15%

larger

price

38%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

3%

faster

consumption

23%

lower

power

7%

higher

length

=

equal

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

30%

larger

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

31%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars