Ford C-Max 1.8 16V
Model Year 2003 (Ford Focus C-Max), M - Segment (MPV)

drivers'

3.0

rating

MPV
MPV
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
1.8 L4 16v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Ford C-Max 1.8 16V

The American car was first shown in year 2003 and powered by a 4 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Mazda. The engine offers a displacement of 1.8 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 5 or a cvt gearbox with ∞ gears. Vehicle in question is a mpv with the top speed of 195km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 10.8s and consuming around 7.2 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Mazda

1.8 L8-DE

displacement:
1798
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
125
hp
torque:
169
Nm
Vehicle information - Ford C-Max
~70% score
produced:
2003. - 2007.
 
body style:
MPV
5 door
length:
4333
mm
width:
1825
mm
height:
1595
mm
boot:
550 - 1620
l
fuel tank:
55
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

E

category

manual gearbox

5 gears

average

7.2

l/100km

weight:
1309
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
10.8
s
top speed:
195
km/h
cons. (urban):
9.7
l/100km
cons. (highway):
5.7
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.2
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
172
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

E

category

cvt

? gears

average

7.7

l/100km

weight:
1344
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
12.4
s
top speed:
187
km/h
cons. (urban):
10.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
6.0
l/100km
cons. (average):
7.7
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
186
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space
mechanics

Safety results for Ford C-Max

EuroNCAP: ~70% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2002. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

10%

slower

consumption

11%

higher

power

1%

higher

length

4%

longer

weight

4%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

30%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

larger

price

20%

lower

produced from 2003. to 2005.  
EuroNCAP: ~50% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

12%

higher

power

=

equal

length

=

equal

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

5%

larger

boot

=

equal

boot ext.

5%

larger

price

20%

higher

produced from 2004. to 2009.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

19%

faster

consumption

8%

higher

power

22%

higher

length

3%

longer

weight

10%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

3%

smaller

boot ext.

1%

smaller

price

43%

higher

produced from 2004. to 2007.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

=

equal

consumption

6%

higher

power

3%

higher

length

1%

longer

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

30%

smaller

boot ext.

4%

smaller

price

45%

higher

produced from 2003. to 2006.  
EuroNCAP: ~90% score

acceleration

4%

faster

consumption

9%

higher

power

17%

higher

length

1%

longer

weight

12%

higher

fuel tank

8%

larger

boot

21%

larger

boot ext.

19%

larger

price

45%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars