administrators / moderators access

username / e-mail:

Search this website:
Basic information
click to

2014. - Production 2013. -
J - SUV Vehicle class J - SUV
suv, 5 door Body style suv, 5 door
Front Wheel drive Front
Dimensons & Volumes
4135 mm
Length 4248 mm
1765 mm
Width 1776 mm
1565 mm
Height 1674 mm
354 liters
Boot (min) 356 liters
1189 liters
Boot (max) 1372 liters
46 liters
Fuel tank 53 liters
Renault / Nissan
1.5 dCi K9K 865
1.7 4EE2
Diesel Fuel Diesel
4 - Inline, 2 valves per cylinder Configuration 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder
Turbo Aspiration Turbo
1461 cc
Displacement 1686 cc
110 hp
Power 130 hp
240 Nm
Torque 300 Nm
Performance (manual gearbox)
manual gearbox - 6 gears
manual gearbox - 6 gears
1247 kg
Vehicle weight 1384 kg
11.2 s
Acc. 0-100 9.6 s
175 km/h
Top speed 186 km/h
4.6 l/100km
Cons. (urban) 5.4 l/100km
3.7 l/100km
Cons. (highway) 4.0 l/100km
4.0 l/100km
Cons. (average) 4.5 l/100km
104 g/km
CO2 emissions g/km
Performance (automatic gearbox)
automatic - 6 gears
Vehicle weight 1387 kg
Acc. 0-100 10.5 s
Top speed 182 km/h
Cons. (urban) 6.4 l/100km
Cons. (highway) 4.6 l/100km
Cons. (average) 5.3 l/100km
CO2 emissions g/km
15100 EUR
Price from 11350 EUR
Virtual Adviser's™ opinion


Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the suv segment and utilize the same 5-door suv body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific diesel engine choice they offer. The first one has a Renault-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 8-valves 110hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 130hp engine designed by Isuzu.


A starting point here would be to take a look at the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests which were performed on both of the cars, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. That aside, let's consider some other aspects which affect safety. Both vehicles belong to the suv segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, if we'd like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, the American car offers a considerable difference of 11% more metal.


Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, at least on all of the models level. That's the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of Nissan with an average rating of 4.2, and models under the Chevrolet badge with 4.3 out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. Above it all, drivers of cars with the same engine as the Japanese car rank it on average as 4.0, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 3.0 out of 5.

Performance & Fuel economy

Chevrolet is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in 1.6 seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 186 kilometers per hour, 11km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around 4.3 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (66 mpg), in combined cycle.


Nissan appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the American car offers significantly better overall protection, taking the lead here. It all continues in the same direction, with Chevrolet being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... No mistake, whatever you decide here, but I'd still go for the Chevrolet. Anyway, that's the most objective conclusion I could've came up with and it's based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, among more than 12.000 different ones in our database.
Copyright © 2015 - 2019 - All rights reserved.
Powered by Gama1 Solutions