administrators / moderators access

username / e-mail:

Search this website:
Basic information
click to

2011. - 2014. Production 2011. - 2014.
S - Sports car Vehicle class S - Sports car
coupe, 4 door Body style coupe, 4 door
Front Wheel drive Front
Dimensons & Volumes
4220 mm
Length 4220 mm
1790 mm
Width 1790 mm
1399 mm
Height 1399 mm
320 liters
Boot (min) 320 liters
1015 liters
Boot (max) 1015 liters
53 liters
Fuel tank 53 liters
Petrol Fuel Petrol
4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Configuration 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder
Naturally Aspir. Aspiration Naturally Aspir.
1591 cc
Displacement 1591 cc
136 hp
Power 130 hp
165 Nm
Torque 157 Nm
Performance (manual gearbox)
manual gearbox - 5 gears
manual gearbox - 6 gears
1160 kg
Vehicle weight kg
9.8 s
Acc. 0-100 9.7 s
201 km/h
Top speed 201 km/h
6.7 l/100km
Cons. (urban) l/100km
5.0 l/100km
Cons. (highway) l/100km
5.6 l/100km
Cons. (average) 6.5 l/100km
132 g/km
CO2 emissions 154 g/km
Performance (automatic gearbox)
automatic - 6 gears
dual clutch - 6 gears
1195 kg
Vehicle weight kg
10.3 s
Acc. 0-100 10.3 s
200 km/h
Top speed 200 km/h
8.0 l/100km
Cons. (urban) l/100km
5.3 l/100km
Cons. (highway) l/100km
6.4 l/100km
Cons. (average) 6.4 l/100km
145 g/km
CO2 emissions 152 g/km
Price from 1 EUR
Virtual Adviser's™ opinion


Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the sports car segment and utilize the same 4-door coupe body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. Both the engines are Hyundai-engineered . The first one has a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 136hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 130hp one.


Vehicles in question are actually the same model so there's nothing here to provide an advantage to any of the two.


Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that Hyundai displays lower than average breakdown numbers, at least on all of the models level. That's the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of Hyundai with an average rating of 4.7 out of 5. That apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as Veloster 1.6 GDI rank it on average as 4.5, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 3.0 out of 5.

Performance & Fuel economy

1.6 MPI is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in 0.1 seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 201 kilometers per hour, exactly the same as the other car does. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be Veloster 1.6 GDI, averaging around 5.6 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (50 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 16% difference compared to Veloster 1.6 MPI.


1.6 GDI appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In this case though, it seems that both cars show similar levels of passenger protection all together, so that won't break a tie. But one thing that actually could is the performance, with 1.6 MPI offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... It's not difficult to say then that if I'd need to make a choice, it would definitely be the 1.6 GDI. Anyway, that's the most objective conclusion I could've came up with and it's based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, out of 12.000+ vehicles we currently have in our database.
Copyright © 2015 - 2019 - All rights reserved.
Powered by Gama1 Solutions