Audi TT Roadster 3.2 Quattro
Model Year 2006 (Audi 8J), S - Segment (Sports car)

drivers'

3.0

rating

Badges:
cabriolet
cabriolet
x 2
x 2
4 x 4
4 x 4
3.2 V6 24v
Nat. Asp.
Nat. Asp.
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Audi TT Roadster 3.2 Quattro

The German car was first shown in year 2006 and powered by a 6 - cylinder nat. asp. petrol unit, produced by Volkswagen. The engine offers a displacement of 3.2 litre matched to a 4 x 4 wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a automatic gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a sports car with the top speed of 250km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 6.1s and consuming around 10.4 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Volkswagen

3.2 VR6

displacement:
3189
cc
configuration:
6 - V config
 
valves:
24, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Nat. Asp.
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
250
hp
torque:
320
Nm
Vehicle information - Audi TT
~70% score
produced:
2006. - 2010.
 
body style:
cabriolet
2 door
length:
4178
mm
width:
1842
mm
height:
1358
mm
boot:
250
l
fuel tank:
55
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

G

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

10.4

l/100km

weight:
1470
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
6.1
s
top speed:
250
km/h
cons. (urban):
14.8
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.8
l/100km
cons. (average):
10.4
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
250
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

F

category

automatic

6 gears

average

9.5

l/100km

weight:
1490
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
5.9
s
top speed:
250
km/h
cons. (urban):
13.0
l/100km
cons. (highway):
7.4
l/100km
cons. (average):
9.5
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
227
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Audi TT

EuroNCAP: ~70% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2005. to 2010.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

13%

slower

consumption

10%

higher

power

4%

higher

length

5%

longer

weight

12%

higher

fuel tank

21%

larger

boot

6%

smaller

boot ext.

6%

smaller

price

114%

lower

produced from 2006. to 2009.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

22%

faster

consumption

14%

higher

power

27%

higher

length

2%

shorter

weight

4%

lower

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

4%

smaller

boot ext.

4%

larger

price

15%

higher

produced from 2004. to 2009.  
EuroNCAP: ~70% score

acceleration

2%

slower

consumption

5%

lower

power

4%

lower

length

1%

shorter

weight

20%

lower

fuel tank

10%

smaller

boot

75%

smaller

boot ext.

75%

smaller

price

63%

higher

produced from 2005. to 2009.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

23%

slower

consumption

27%

lower

power

56%

lower

length

5%

shorter

weight

37%

lower

fuel tank

10%

smaller

boot

67%

smaller

boot ext.

67%

smaller

price

39%

lower

produced from 2004. to 2008.  
EuroNCAP: not tested

acceleration

3%

slower

consumption

7%

lower

power

8%

lower

length

2%

shorter

weight

10%

lower

fuel tank

21%

larger

boot

20%

smaller

boot ext.

17%

larger

price

1%

lower

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.531different vehicle models
2.233engines
13.778specific cars